PLA–PHB–PLA Triblock Copolymers: Synthesis by Sequential Addition and Investigation of Mechanical and Rheological Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dinuclear indium catalyst [(NNO)InCl] 2 (μ-OEt)(μ-Cl), previously reported to be highly active for the living ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters lactide (LA) and β-butyrolactone (BBL), was used to generate a series of triblock copolymers of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(hydroxybutyrate) (PHB). Copolymers PLLA–PDLLA–PLLA and PLLA–PDLLA–PDLA, synthesized via sequential monomer addition, showed low molecular weight distributions and excellent correlation between the calculated and experiment molecular weights. Significantly, triblock copolymers of the type PLA–PHB–PLA were also synthesized for the first time through a sequential addition technique. Analysis of polymers after each addition of monomer showed that although only 85% conversion was achieved after addition of BBL, the remaining chain ends were active and addition of more lactide yielded a triblock. Rheological studies of PLLA–PHB–PDLA indicated solid like behavior even well above the temperature at which stereocomplex formation was observed. These elastomeric triblocks exhibited elongations at break 5–10 times greater than those of corresponding PLLA–PDLLA–PLDA triblocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".