CMOS SPADs: Design Issues and Research Challenges for Detectors, Circuits, and Arrays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solid-state single photon detectors are playing a significant role in the development of high-performance single-photon imaging systems for fluorescence lifetime imaging, time-of-flight positron emission tomography and Raman Spectroscopy applications. The main driving factors are the unparalleled levels of miniaturization and portability, low fabrication costs, and high overall performance resulting from the integration of single-photon avalanche diodes (SPADs) with mixed-signal circuits in deep-submicron (DSM) complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology. At the heart of such imaging systems is the SPAD, capable of single-photon sensitivity and sub-nanosecond time resolution, and its associated circuitry, which in DSM CMOS, is capable of high-speed, low-power mixed-mode signal processing. In this paper, we review and discuss the most recent developments in DSM CMOS SPAD detectors, circuits and arrays and investigate issues of scalability, miniaturization and performance trade-offs involved in designing SPAD imaging systems. Design considerations, research challenges, and future directions for CMOS SPAD image sensors will be highlighted and addressed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it