Inspiratory and Expiratory Helical CT of Normal Adults
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY: To evaluate and compare thin section CT scans (TSS) and minimum intensity projection images (MinIPs) in healthy individuals, 10 nonsmokers with normal pulmonary function tests were studied using ten 1-mm collimated, helically acquired TSS images after full inspiration and expiration at two anatomic levels. Ten-millimeter-thick MinIPs were generated from the helical scans. Two thoracic radiologists compared TSS and MinIPs for artifacts and air trapping. Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements of TSS and MinIPs were obtained. The lung parenchyma on MinIPs demonstrates a smooth anterior-to-posterior attenuation gradient, accentuated by expiration. Motion and beam-hardening artifacts on TSS images resulted in regions of high and low attenuation on MinIPs, respectively. Expiratory TSS and MinIPs demonstrated air trapping (n = 31/40; range, 0-25%; mean, 7.2%). In comparison with TSS, MinIPs improved the conspicuity of air trapping (n = 20) and appeared to detect more air trapping (n = 7). No statistical differences were found when comparing the mean HU values of TSS and MinIPs. MinIPs demonstrated a smooth anterior-to-posterior attenuation gradient. Compared with TSS, MinIPs improve the conspicuity of air trapping in healthy individuals. Therefore, expiratory MinIPs may be useful in detecting air trapping as a result of disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it