Peering Through The Sands Of Time: A Geophysical Investigation Of Two Buried Ships
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the Spring of 2001, the wooden ribs of an unknown ship were discovered protruding from the<br>beach in Southampton, Ontario. A ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey was performed over the<br>wreck as part of the site characterization. Near surface scattering was used to infer zones of buried<br>wreckage. Test pits were dug based on locations of GPR anomalies and the remains of a sizeable ship<br>and a small barge were partially unearthed. A subsequent magnetic survey was performed to delineate<br>ferrous structural artifacts.<br>The comparison of the geophysical data and excavation results demonstrates the ability of each<br>method to detect and delineate buried structures. Direct interpretation of the GPR profile data highlights<br>the general area of known wreckage, but an exact delineation is not possible. In the case of the magnetic<br>survey, major structural features of the vessels are clearly identifiable and yield information on the size<br>and orientation of each vessel.<br>In October, 2002, a third excavation took place to investigate details of the larger ship. During<br>the course of this excavation, a small deck cannon was discovered among the remains, coincident with a<br>large reverberation event on one of the GPR profiles. This discovery has important historical<br>implications and is considered an extremely significant find in the archaeological context of the Great<br>Lakes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".