MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324179234 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-537

Abstract 537: Mechanisms by which pantoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, enhances the activity of doxorubicin in solid tumors

2011· article· en· W2324179234 on OpenAlexaffabout
Qian Tan, Krupa Patel, Carol Lee, Junyan Zhang, Anthony M. Joshua, Marianne Koritzinsky, Bradly G. Wouters, Ian F. Tannock

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicATP Synthase and ATPases Research
Canadian institutionsToronto and Region Conservation AuthorityITS Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoxorubicinAutophagyChemistryCancer researchCancer cellCytotoxicityPharmacologyFlow cytometryApoptosisCancerBiologyMolecular biologyIn vitroBiochemistryMedicineChemotherapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: Mechanisms of tumour resistance to cytotoxic drugs in solid tumours include limited drug distribution from tumour blood vessels and other effects of the tumour microenvironment. Proton pump inhibitors, such as pantoprazole (PTP), raise endosomal pH and thereby decrease sequestration of basic drugs in acidic compartments. This may allow more drugs to interact with DNA, while decreased net cellular uptake of drug, may allow more drugs to penetrate tissue to distal cells. PTP might also inhibit autophagy, a possible target for anticancer therapy, since endosomes are important intermediaries of this process. Here we describe the effects of PTP on doxorubicin uptake and distribution in cell cultures and solid tumours, and effects to cause growth delay. We have also evaluated the effect of PTP on autophagy of tumour cells. Methods: Endosomal pH of cells was measured by using Lysosensor and fluorescence spectroscopy. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by a colony-forming assay. Doxorubicin distribution was quantified in MCF-7 xenografts by immunohistochemistry, in relation to blood vessels (recognized by an antibody to CD31), and regions of hypoxia (recognized by an antibody to EF5), with and without pre-treatment with PTP. Anti-tumour effects were evaluated by growth delay following treatment with single or multiple doses of doxorubicin with and without PTP. Effects of PTP on autophagy were evaluated by (i) expression of the LC3II protein by Western blotting and (ii) effects of PTP on prostate cancer PC3 cells transfected with green fluorescent protein) and with LC3 protein (a marker of autophagy) tagged with red fluorescent protein (mRFP-GFP-LC3 cells) Results: PTP increased endosomal pH and decreased endosomal sequestration of doxorubicin in cultured cells. Pre-treatment with PTP increased the distribution of doxorubicin in solid tumours. PTP alone had no effect on tumour growth but increased the effect of doxorubicin to cause growth delay of human tumour xenografts with no apparent increase in toxicity. PTP showed marked effects to inhibit autophagy in cultured tumour cells in a dose and time dependent manner. Conclusions/Discussion: PTP increases the effectiveness of doxorubicin against solid tumours and this combination is being investigated in a phase I clinical trial. Potential mechanisms underlying this effect include inhibition of sequestration of doxorubicin in endosomes permitting better drug distribution, and inhibition of autophagy. Supported by a research grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 537. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-537

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicATP Synthase and ATPases ResearchFrench-language works237,207