STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE OF A PLANE FRAME FOR COMPOSITE CES STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A static loading test was carried out on a two-bay two-story concrete encased steel (CES) frame in which the beams and columns consisted of only steel and fiber reinforced concrete (FRC). In this test, the structural behavior of the frame such as the failure modes, hysteresis characteristics and deformation capacity was examined. Although the frame designed to be a weak beam-strong column system with the flexural yielding at the both ends of beams and the bottom of the first story columns, the shear yielding in the joint panel of the interior beam-column joints also occurred. The results showed that the use of FRC in the CES frame controlled the damage of the concrete. In addition, the frame had stable hysteresis loops with almost no degradation in load carrying capacity until the average story drift angle of 0.05 rad. Static inelastic analysis with reversal loading was also conducted to simulate the story shear versus story drift response of the frame. It is shown that the analytical results agree well with the test results in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it