MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2324339247 · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1308663

Second-Pandemic Strain of<i>Vibrio cholerae</i>from the Philadelphia Cholera Outbreak of 1849

2014· article· en· W2324339247 on OpenAlexafffund
Alison Devault, G. Brian Golding, Nicholas Waglechner, Jacob Enk, Melanie Kuch, Joseph H. Tien, Mǎng Shī, David N. Fisman, Anna N. Dhody, Stephen Forrest, Kirsten I. Bos, David J. D. Earn, Edward C. Holmes, Hendrik N. Poinar

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioMcMaster University
FundersMedical Research CouncilSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMcMaster UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMassachusetts Medical Society
KeywordsVibrio choleraeCholeraOutbreakEl TorPandemicProphageGenomeCholera toxinStrain (injury)VirologyBiologyGeneticsMicrobiologyMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)GeneInfectious disease (medical specialty)BacteriophageBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summ a r yIn the 19th century, there were several major cholera pandemics in the Indian subcontinent, Europe, and North America.The causes of these outbreaks and the genomic strain identities remain a mystery.We used targeted high-throughput sequencing to reconstruct the Vibrio cholerae genome from the preserved intestine of a victim of the 1849 cholera outbreak in Philadelphia, part of the second cholera pandemic.This O1 biotype strain has 95 to 97% similarity with the classical O395 genome, differing by 203 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), lacking three genomic islands, and probably having one or more tandem cholera toxin prophage (CTX) arrays, which potentially affected its virulence.This result highlights archived medical remains as a potential resource for investigations into the genomic origins of past pandemics.C holera is a diarrheal disease caused by colonization of the intestines by cholera toxin-expressing strains of the waterborne enteric bacterium V. cholerae.An outbreak can arise suddenly, especially in vulnerable populations with compromised sanitation infrastructure, as in the devastating 2010 outbreak in Haiti. 1 In 2012 alone, V. cholerae infected 3 million to 4 million people, killing nearly 100,000. 2 Although all pathogenic V. cholerae strains possess a similar genomic backbone that may have facilitated adaptation to human intestinal mucosa, 3,4 the predominant pathogenic strain, serogroup O1, harbors two genetically distinct biotypes: classical and El Tor (for descriptions of these and other terms, see the Glossary).In the 20th century, for unknown reasons, El Tor replaced classical as the dominant bio type.There have been seven documented pandemics since 1817, 5 but the causal V. cholerae strains have been genetically characterized only for the two most recent outbreaks.Therefore, although most assume that the classical biotype was responsible for the earlier pandemics, 6 the identities of the strains that caused them remain unknown.Diverse tissue specimens archived by medical practitioners at the time of an outbreak represent an essentially untapped genetic museum for pathogen research.One extraordinary collection includes a preserved intestine from a patient who died from cholera in the 1849 Philadelphia outbreak (Fig. 1), collected by Dr. John Neill.By coupling targeted enrichment with high-throughput sequencing, 7 we used trace degraded DNA from this specimen to reconstruct a mid-19th century V. cholerae genome and to test the hypothesis that the O1 classical biotype was responsible for the second cholera pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations155
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew England Journal of Medicine→Same topicVibrio bacteria research studies→French-language works237,207→