Exploring Chromium(III)−Alkyl Bond Homolysis with CpCr[(ArNCMe)<sub>2</sub>CH](R) Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A range of paramagnetic Cr(III) monohydrocarbyl complexes CpCr[(ArNCMe)2CH](R) (Ar = ortho-disubstituted aryl; R = primary alkyl, trimethylsilylmethyl, benzyl, phenyl, alkenyl, or alkynyl) were synthesized to investigate how varying the steric and electronic properties of the R group affected their propensity for Cr-R bond homolysis. Most complexes were prepared by salt metathesis of known CpCr[(ArNCMe)2CH](Cl) compounds in Et2O with commercial RMgCl solutions, although more sterically demanding combinations of Ar and R groups necessitated the use of halide-free MgR2 reagents and the Cr(III) tosylate or triflate derivatives. Alternative synthetic routes to Cr(III)-R species using the previously reported Cr(II) compounds CpCr[(ArNCMe)2CH] and sources of R· radicals (e.g., BEt3 and air) were also explored. The UV-vis spectra of the CpCr[(ArNCMe)2CH](R) complexes possessed two strong bands with maximum absorbances in the ranges 395-436 nm and 535-582 nm, with the band in the latter range being particularly characteristic of the Cr(III)-R compounds. The Cr-CH2R bond lengths as determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction were longer than those in the corresponding Cr-CH3 complexes, typically falling in the range 2.10 to 2.13 Å. The Cr(III) benzyl compounds displayed longer Cr-CH2Ph distances, while the bond lengths for the alkenyl and alkynyl species were substantially shorter. The rate of Cr-R bond homolysis at room temperature was determined by monitoring the reaction of Cr(III) neopentyl, benzyl, and isobutyl complexes with excess PhSSPh using UV-vis spectroscopy. Although the other primary alkyl, phenyl, and alkenyl compounds did not undergo appreciable homolysis under these conditions, they were cleanly converted to CpCr[(ArNCMe)2CH](SPh) by photolysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".