Abstract 326: Prognostic value of KIF14 and MDM4 in Ewing's sarcoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rearrangements of the long arm of chromosome 1 are widely recognized in many cancers including Ewing's sarcoma (EWS). Copy number alterations through genomic gains and aneuploidy of chromosome 1 suggest the presence of loci responsible for EWS progression. We report here our investigation of mapping the region 1q32, which spans 4.2Mb and encompasses two candidate oncogenes that may contribute to EWS pathogenesis: KIF14 and MDM4. The genes encode proteins involved in the final phase of cytokinesis, in cell survival, and replicate early in the cell cycle. These findings suggest the presence of important proliferation-regulating genes on chromosome 1q implicated in driving progression of EWS. We hypothesize that secondary alterations of KIF14 and MDM4, their replication pattern, along with chromosome 1 aneuploidy, are associated with clinical parameters of progression. Multi - color interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on a tissue microarray (TMA) including 112 patient specimens using in house BAC probes for KIF14 and MDM4. Gain was defined by the presence of more than three hybridization signals per interphase nucleus with simultaneous intact centrosome signal occurring in more than 5% of nuclei. Aneuploidy was considered when the tumor cells exceeded the mean control +2 SD stage. We classified gene replication pattern as synchronous (SS, DD), or asynchronous (SD), according to the replication status of two homologous loci. Multiplet signals were analyzed when we observed clusters of more than 3 signals separated by less than one signal diameter. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS program. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Copy numbers alterations were detected in 27/112 (24.1%) EWS patients. FISH analyses indicated 1q32 locus gain in 2/27 (7.4%), polysomy in 19/27 (70.4%) and 1q32 locus gain plus polysomy in 6/27 (22.2%). Disease-free survival analysis of the 1q32 gain plus aneuploidy of chromosome 1 versus only gain at 1q32 identified a shorter time interval in those patients that presented with 1q32 gain plus aneuploidy of chromosome 1 concurrently (p=0.04). Interestingly, univariate data analysis showed association with asynchronous gene replication pattern of KIF14 and polysomy (p=0.040) as well as tumor relapse (p=0.031). Furthermore, the multiplet replication pattern of MDM4 showed association with polysomy (p=0.014) and with poor clinical treatment response (p=0.045). It was noteworthy that in this cohort no statistically significant association was seen between treated and untreated groups. Genomic secondary alterations of 1q32 and simultaneous extra copies of chromosome 1 appear to define a small clinical subset of EWS patients with distinctly poor outcome. Significantly, the asynchronous gene replication pattern of KIF14 and MDM4 has potential prognostic value in stratifying of patients for risk, in which their corresponding products are possible therapeutic targets. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 326.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".