MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324475251 · doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.18

Viruses in granitic groundwater from 69 to 450 m depth of the Äspö hard rock laboratory, Sweden

2008· article· en· W2324475251 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Kyle, Hallgerd S C Eydal, F. G. Ferris, Karsten Pedersen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe ISME Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSwedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education
KeywordsLytic cycleBiologyGroundwaterBacteriophageVirusGeomicrobiologyAbundance (ecology)MicroorganismBK virusMicrobiologyVirologyEcologyBacteriaGeologyPaleontologyGeneEscherichia coliKidney

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objectives of this study were to determine if viruses exist in deep granitic groundwater and to analyse their abundance and morphological diversity. Fluorescent microscopy counts on 10 groundwater samples ranging from 69 to 450 m depth were in the range of 10(4)-10(6) TNC ml(-1) (TNC, total number of prokaryotic cells) and 10(5)-10(7) VLP ml(-1) (VLP, virus-like particles). A good positive correlation of VLP with TNC (r=0.91, P=0.0003) was found with an average VLP/TNC ratio of 12. Transmission electron microscopy revealed four distinct bacteriophage groups (polyhedral, tailed, filamentous and pleomorphic) with at least seven phage families of which some are known to be lytic. Our results suggest the presence of viruses in deep granitic groundwater up to 450 m depth. If they are active and lytic, they will constitute an important group of predators that might control the numbers of microorganisms in the analysed groundwater.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations116
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe ISME JournalSame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207