MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324508043 · doi:10.1097/icb.0000000000000188

DEVELOPMENT OF EPSTEIN–BARR VIRUS UVEITIS AFTER REMISSION OF PRIMARY VITREORETINAL LYMPHOMA

2015· article· en· W2324508043 on OpenAlexaff
Barinder S. Chahal, Steve Rasmussen, Valerie A. White, Farzin Forooghian

Bibliographic record

VenueRetinal Cases & Brief Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUveitisVitrectomyLymphomaEpstein–Barr virusIntraocular lymphomaVirusAcute retinal necrosisDermatologyPathologyImmunologyRetinitisVisual acuityOphthalmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Purpose: To describe a case of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) uveitis that occurred after the treatment and remission of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL). Methods: Descriptive case report. Complete ophthalmologic evaluation, cytology, polymerase chain reaction, cytokine analysis of aqueous humor, and diagnostic vitrectomy were performed. Results: A 66-year-old Caucasian woman developed uveitis in the same eye 20 months after remission of PVRL. Empiric chemotherapy failed to treat the suspected PVRL recurrence, and aqueous humor cytology showed an absence of malignant cells. Qualitative polymerase chain reaction of aqueous humor confirmed the presence of EBV. Treatment for EBV resulted in remission of the uveitis. Conclusion: The authors describe a rare case of EBV uveitis that was preceded by PVRL. It is important to consider EBV in cases where suspected recurrence of PVRL does not respond to appropriate treatment. The authors describe a rare case of Epstein–Barr virus uveitis that was preceded by primary vitreoretinal lymphoma. Epstein–Barr virus uveitis can occur in patients who are in remission from primary vitreoretinal lymphoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRetinal Cases & Brief ReportsSame topicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207