DEVELOPMENT OF EPSTEIN–BARR VIRUS UVEITIS AFTER REMISSION OF PRIMARY VITREORETINAL LYMPHOMA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Purpose: To describe a case of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) uveitis that occurred after the treatment and remission of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL). Methods: Descriptive case report. Complete ophthalmologic evaluation, cytology, polymerase chain reaction, cytokine analysis of aqueous humor, and diagnostic vitrectomy were performed. Results: A 66-year-old Caucasian woman developed uveitis in the same eye 20 months after remission of PVRL. Empiric chemotherapy failed to treat the suspected PVRL recurrence, and aqueous humor cytology showed an absence of malignant cells. Qualitative polymerase chain reaction of aqueous humor confirmed the presence of EBV. Treatment for EBV resulted in remission of the uveitis. Conclusion: The authors describe a rare case of EBV uveitis that was preceded by PVRL. It is important to consider EBV in cases where suspected recurrence of PVRL does not respond to appropriate treatment. The authors describe a rare case of Epstein–Barr virus uveitis that was preceded by primary vitreoretinal lymphoma. Epstein–Barr virus uveitis can occur in patients who are in remission from primary vitreoretinal lymphoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".