MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324538553 · doi:10.1093/chrsci/49.3.209

Simultaneous Determination of Six Major Active Furocoumarins in Radix Glehniae by HPLC-DAD

2011· article· en· W2324538553 on OpenAlexaff
旭光 鄭, Hantao Zhu, Z. Yuan, Limin Zhang, Xuefeng Zhang, X. Sheng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chromatographic Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant chemical constituents analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImperatorinFurocoumarinsChemistryChromatographyPsoralenBergaptenHigh-performance liquid chromatographyRadix (gastropod)FurocoumarinChromatography detectorElution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A rapid, reliable, and sensitive method for the simultaneous determination of 6 furocoumarins (psoralen, xanthotoxin, bergapten, imperatorin, cnidilin, and isoimperatorin) in Radix glehniae was developed using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) coupled with diode array detection. The HPLC assay was performed on an Ultimate C18 column (5 µm, 250 mm × 4 mm) with gradient elution of acetonitrile and water within 20 min. The detection wavelength was set at 310 nm. All compounds showed good linearity (r2 > 0.999). The RSD of intra-day and inter-day variations ranged from 0.2% to 2.7% and 0.3% to 1.7%. The recovery of the assay was in the range of 91.7–107.6%. The method was successfully applied to the simultaneously determination of 6 furocoumarins in Radix glehniae from different areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chromatographic ScienceSame topicPlant chemical constituents analysisFrench-language works237,207