MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Disappeared Islet Graft after Intraportal Transplantation in the Recipient Suffered from Recurrent Sepsis

2012· article· en· W2324619388 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Takayuki Anazawa, T. Tsuchiya, Akira Kenjo, Junichiro Haga, Tomoko Sato, Naoya Sato, Kazuya Ise, Takuro Saito, Keiko Tasaki, Mitsukazu Gotoh

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTransplantationIsletDaclizumabSepsisSurgeryDiabetes mellitusLiver transplantationInsulinGastroenterologyInternal medicineTacrolimusEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Pancreatic islet transplantation is an emerging treatment option for type 1 diabetes mellitus, however, insulin independence is gradually lost over time in most cases. The lack of methods to monitor β-cell mass render the intrahepatic grafted islets a “black box”. A detailed pathological finding of intraportally grafted islets in autopsy specimen would make a significant contribution to understand islet engraftment. We report a finding of autopsy from a patient who received three consecutive islet transplants. She suffered from recurrent sepsis after transplant and ultimately lost C-peptide secretion. Clinical case: A 41 years old female suddenly died of an acute pulmonary thromboembolism 4 years after third islet transplant. The patient underwent three islet transplants by infusion of islets into the portal vein with daclizumab induction and sirolimus and tacrolimus maintenance (the Edmonton protocol). All transplants were isolated from donors after cardiac death, given 14 and 21 months after the first transplant, respectively. She had good glycemic control and low insulin requirement (0.2-0.3U/kg/day) after transplant, but had not achieved insulin independence. Immunosuppressive drugs were reduced and discontinued due to recurrent sepsis by acute cellulitis or catheterassociated infection. Finally, fasting serum C-peptide concentrations were quite low (< 0.3 ng/ml) 3 years after final transplant. Result: A complete autopsy was performed. No transplanted islets were identified in the portal vein area. There were no tissues or cells stained for insulin and chromogranin in the liver, and no amyloid fibrils were identified. Multiple hepatic microabscesses were observed with CD15 positive neutrophil infiltration around zone II (transition zone) and zone III (centrilobular), suggesting possible involvement of recurrent hematogenous infection. The entire pancreas was submitted for histological review and few islets without staining insulin were identified. Conclusion: This report shows that the pathological appearance of the “end-stage islet graft” infused to the portal vein. No evidence was found to support an immunological basis or a non-immunological basis for the loss of intrahepatic islets, and the causal linkage between hepatic microabscesses and graft loss cannot be confirmed. Possible reasons for islet graft loss should be discussed to establish safer and more attractive islet transplantation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207