MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Case of Fatal Benzylpiperazine (BZP) and Trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP) Toxicity

2012· article· en· W2324620923 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Craig Chatterton, Graham Jones, Peter P. Singer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Society of Forensic Science Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Canadian institutionsWorkers Compensation Board of AlbertaOffice of the Chief Medical Examiner
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrineForensic toxicologyMDMAMethamphetamineMedicineChemistryPharmacologyInternal medicineChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Toxicology analysis carried out on several postmortem samples relating to the sudden death of a 21-year-old male, confirmed the presence of high concentrations of N-benzylpiperazine (BZP) and 3-trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP). Methamphetamine (MA), 3,4-methylenedioxy- methylamphetamine (MDMA, ‘Ecstasy’) and trace amounts of 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) and amphetamine were also detected. Items examined included femoral blood, vitreous, urine, liver, bile and gastric contents, which were all obtained during a postmortem examination that was carried out within 24 hours of the discovery of the body. A number of brightly coloured tablets (recovered from the scene) were also analysed and were found to contain primarily BZP and TFMPP. One type of tablet additionally contained MA. Postmortem blood and other specimens analysed by GC/MS with selected ion monitoring using TFMPP-d4 as the internal standard, gave the following results: BZP: femoral blood 21.4, vitreous 25.2, liver 120, bile, 200, gastric 80; TFMPP femoral blood 3.3, vitreous 1.7, urine 90, liver 84, bile 61 and gastric 37 (all results mg/L except liver mg/kg and gastric mg/78.1 g). Femoral blood also contained 0.22 mg/L of MA and 0.26 mg/L MDMA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Society of Forensic Science JournalSame topicForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisFrench-language works237,207