MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324661095 · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3182028ae5

Polyostotic Fibrous Dysplasia of the Thoracic Spine

2011· review· en· W2324661095 on OpenAlexaff
Guangdong Chen, Huilin Yang, Minfeng Gan, Xuefeng Li, Badri Nalajala, Genlin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Canadian institutionsObject Research Systems (Canada)Discovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePolyostotic fibrous dysplasiaSacrumFibrous dysplasiaThoracic spineBack painSurgeryPercutaneousThoracic vertebraeRadiologyLumbar vertebraePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: A case report of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia including thoracic spine, sacral vertebrae, and temporal bone, with the symptom of back pain. OBJECTIVE: To treat the lesions with percutaneous kyphoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Polyostotic fibrous dysplasia involving either spine or temporal bone is rarely seen. Few reports of this disorder appear in the literature. This is the first case including thoracic spine, sacrum, and temporal bone together presented to date. METHODS: The patient was a 56-year-old woman with polyostotic fibrous dysplasia involving the thoracic spine of the eighth, ninth, and 10th vertebral body; adjacent rib; the right temporal bone and the sacrum. Percutaneous kyphoplasty in ninth and 10th vertebral body was carried out to achieve substantial pain relief and rapid stabilization of the spine with minimal invasion. RESULTS: The patient experienced complete pain relief and had no clinical complications associated with the cement leakage. The patient tolerated the procedure well. There were no clinical complications and substantial pain relief was noted within hours of the procedure. She has no pain or disability at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous kyphoplasty was a good therapeutic option for the reported patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207