Insights into the Solvation and Mobility of the Hydroxyl Radical in Aqueous Solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A detailed description of the local solvation structure and mobility of hydroxyl radicals (OH*) in aqueous solution near ambient conditions is provided by Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics simulations. Here, we demonstrate that for HCTH/120 and BLYP functionals, smaller systems (i.e., 31·H2O-OH*) are contaminated by system size effects, being biased for the presence of a three-electron two-centered hemibond structure between the oxygen atoms of a water molecule and the radical. Radial and spatial distribution functions of relatively large 63·H2O-OH* systems reveal the existence of a 4-fold coordinated "inactive" OH* structure with three H-bond donating neighbors and a strongly coordinated H-bond accepting neighbor. The local hydration structure around the radical exhibits more H-bond ordering than has been predicted by recent simulations employing classical force fields. Local structural fluctuations can end with spontaneous H-transfer reactions from the nearest H-bond donor water molecule, facilitated by the formation of an "active" OH* state, resembling the proton transfer mechanism of hydrated OH(-) (i.e., slight polarization of the (H3O2)* complex). A comparison of the free energy barriers for the H-transfer reaction obtained by both DFT functionals and for both system sizes is also provided, demonstrating that this can be a very rapid process in water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".