MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324686009 · doi:10.2490/jjrm1963.38.981

Effects of Cold Exposure on Anaerobic Power of Children.

2001· article· en· W2324686009 on OpenAlexaff
Manabu Iwata, Izumi Kondo, Kanoko HOSOKAWA, Masashi Soma, Rebecca Martin HENRY, Oded Bar‐Or

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityChedoke Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnaerobic exercisePower (physics)Environmental scienceAnimal scienceStatisticsMathematicsMedicinePhysical therapyPhysicsBiologyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

低温暴露が小児の無酸素性パワーに与える影響について,ウインゲート無酸素性テスト(WAnT)を用いて検討した.被験者は9~13歳の健常男子12名であった.低温暴露には人工気象室を使用し,常温環境(23℃,相対湿度40%)と低温環境(5℃,相対湿度40%)で30分間の安静の後,それぞれWAnTを2分間の休憩をはさんで2回施行した.両温度環境の1回目のWAnTにおけるmean powerの比較では,有意差が認められなかった.各々の温度環境において2回目のWAnTのmean powerを1回目のWAnTのmean powerで除して算出した回復率の比較では,低温環境において回復率が有意に低下していた.以上より低温暴露は小児の無酸素性パワーに影響を与えないが,回復を遅延させると考えられた.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation MedicineSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207