MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324730783 · doi:10.1139/cjm-2013-0793

Role of prokaryotic type I and III pantothenate kinases in the coenzyme A biosynthetic pathway of<i>Bacillus subtilis</i>

2014· article· en· W2324730783 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuta Ogata, Hiroki Katoh, Munehiko Asayama, Shigeru Chohnan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological diseases and metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacillus subtilisBiochemistryBiosynthesisBiologyCoenzyme AKinaseEnzymeCofactorIntracellularGeneBacteriaPhosphorylationBacillaceaeRecombinant DNAReductaseGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pantothenate kinases (CoaAs) catalyze the phosphorylation of pantothenate in the first step of the coenzyme A (CoA) biosynthetic pathway. These bacterial enzymes have been categorized into 3 types, the prokaryotic type I, II, and III CoaAs. Bacteria typically carry a single CoaA gene on their genome, but Bacillus subtilis possesses 2 proteins homologous to type I and III CoaAs, known as BsCoaA and BsCoaX, respectively. Both recombinant proteins exhibited the expected kinase activity and the characteristic properties of type I and III CoaAs, i.e., regulation by CoASH and acyl-CoAs in BsCoaA and the requirement of a monovalent cation in BsCoaX. Both gene disruptants appeared to grow in a manner similar to the wild-type strain. With the BsCoaX disruptant, the BsCoaA had the ability to completely fill the intracellular CoA pool, whereas the BsCoaA disruptant did not. These findings clearly indicate that these 2 CoaAs are employed together in the CoA biosynthetic pathway in B. subtilis and that the contribution of the type I CoaA (BsCoaA) to the formation of the intracellular CoA pool is larger than that of the type III CoaA (BsCoaX).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicNeurological diseases and metabolismFrench-language works237,207