Optimal Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potential Stimulus Intensity Can Be Determined by Nerve Action Potential Amplitude
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Muscle twitch threshold has been used to determine optimal stimulus intensity for somatosensory evoked potentials but neuromuscular blockade precludes the use of muscle twitch during surgery. Accordingly, nerve action potential (NAP) amplitude was investigated as a surrogate to muscle twitch. METHODS: The ulnar and tibial nerves were stimulated at the wrist and ankle, respectively, in 27 patients undergoing spine and brain surgery. After neuromuscular blockade was gone, the stimulus intensity for just maximal NAP amplitude recorded from Erb's point and the popliteal fossa was compared with the stimulus intensity for hypothenar and plantar foot muscle twitch threshold (times two), respectively (Wilcoxon matched pairs test). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between stimulus intensity for just maximal Erb's point and popliteal fossa NAP amplitude when compared with stimulus intensity for hypothenar and plantar foot twitch threshold (times two), respectively. Eight patients required more than twitch intensity (times two) to obtain maximum NAP. CONCLUSIONS: The NAP amplitude may be used to determine optimal somatosensory evoked potential stimulus intensity when muscle twitch is not visible. This method should improve the success of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring and decrease erroneous interpretation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".