The Synthesis of Active and Stable Diaminopimelate Analogues of the Lantibiotic Peptide Lactocin S
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lantibiotic peptides are potent antimicrobial compounds produced by Gram-positive bacteria. They can be used in food preservation, and some also show potential for clinical applications. Unfortunately, some of these peptides can be susceptible to inactivation by oxidation of the sulfur-containing amino acid lanthionine, limiting their use. Here we describe the synthesis and testing of diaminopimelate analogues of the lantibiotic lactocin S. These analogues were designed to improve the oxidative stability of the peptide by replacing the sulfur in lanthionine with a methylene unit. Lanthionine was systematically replaced with diaminopimelate during solid-phase peptide synthesis to produce several analogues. One analogue, A-DAP lactocin S, was found to retain full biological activity in addition to displaying increased stability. This is the first time a synthetic lanthionine ring analogue of a lantibiotic has retained natural activity levels. This methodology is potentially very promising for use in producing more stable, medically relevant lantibiotics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".