MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2324935748 · doi:10.1190/segam2015-5920148.1

Migration-induced noise reduction using fast discrete curvelet transform

2015· article· en· W2324935748 on OpenAlexaff
Dong Shi, B. Milkereit

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise reductionReduction (mathematics)Noise (video)CurveletComputer scienceImage denoisingArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMathematicsWavelet transformImage (mathematics)Wavelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Seismic data are unavoidably contaminated with noise. Theissue becomes worse for applications in mineralexplorations in hardrock environments where the complexnear- and sub-surface conditions result in variable signalamplitudes and attenuations (Eaton et al., 2003). Meanwhile, the quality of processing is usuallyuncontrollable, consequently, yielding remnant local noisyevents as singularities on stacked seismic images. Thesesingularities perform as backscattering sources during themigration process to create artificial features interferingwith interpretation. No post-migration processing techniquehas yet demonstrated effectiveness to reduce this artificialnoise. This problem can be solved by the curvelet transformfor the efficiency of representing directional features onseismic images. We investigate the elimination of themigration-induced noise using a 2D fast discrete curvelettransform (FDCT) threshold applied to a synthetic Stolttime-migrated impulse response. The result shows asignificant removal of migration-induced noise. Thisimprovement is also applied to a 3D post-stack time-migrated (PoSTM) seismic cube, resulting in anenhancement of the original signal and a suppression of theinduced noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207