Large-Scale Production of PMMA/SWCNT Composites Based on SWCNT Modified with PMMA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, a two-step method consisting of in situ polymerization of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) in the presence of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT), followed by the redispersion of the resulting compound in dimethylformamide (DMF), was used to fabricate SWCNT modified with PMMA (SWCNT-PMMA). Raman spectroscopy revealed that PMMA was merely wrapped around the SWCNT when raw SWCNT or purified SWCNT were used as the starting material. However, PMMA was covalently bonded to SWCNT when acid treated SWCNT (SWCNT-COOH) was used as the starting material. SWCNT-PMMA compounds were further diluted in pure PMMA by conventional melt compounding at large scale (several kilograms) to obtain transparent composites containing 0.09 wt % SWCNT. The micro- and nano-dispersion of the SWCNT in the composites were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The thermal and mechanical properties of the composites were determined by thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), tensile testing, and Charpy impact testing. At the the low SWCNT loading studied, the tensile properties remain unchanged, whereas the impact strength improves by 20%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".