MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Towards New Estimated Daily Intakes for the Canadian Population

2010· article· en· W2325055895 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yvette Bonvalot, Harriet Phillips, Leah Windisch, Mark Richardson

Bibliographic record

VenueEpidemiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicRadioactivity and Radon Measurements
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)Inro Consultants (Canada)Université de MontréalLa Boîte à lettresResearch CanadaHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbabilistic logicPopulationEnvironmental scienceHuman healthComputer scienceEnvironmental healthStatisticsMathematicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O-01A2-2 Background/Aims: Health Canada's Contaminated Sites Division is involved in the revision and development of new human health soil quality guidelines (HHSQGs). Part of the HHSQG development process relies on Estimated Daily Intakes (EDIs) which estimate the typical concurrent background exposure to chemicals from all known or suspected sources (air, water, soil, dust, food and consumer products) via all known or suspected routes of exposure (inhalation, ingestion, dermal contact) for the average Canadian. Instead of using a deterministic approach to derive EDIs, a probabilistic one has been developed and will be presented as well as its strengths, limitations and recommended future improvements. Methods: For each chemical under HHSQG revision or update, an extensive review of all the available Canadian databases covering air, water, soil, dust, and food was performed through grey and scientific literature searches. The scientific validity of all available papers, grey reports, and databases was assessed using a quality score tool developed for this purpose. Then, after final selection of key data, all the environmental concentration distribution parameters and all the physiological distribution parameters involved in the EDI equations were estimated. The Crystal Ball add-in software for excel was used for the Monte-Carlo simulations and probabilistic EDI distributions were obtained for each of the 5 Health Canada human receptor age groups. Results: Instead of deriving deterministic EDIs, EDI multimedia probabilistic distributions are obtained through a fully transparent and systematic approach. This has already been done for 9 chemicals or species (Barium, Beryllium, Cadmium, Total and Hexavalent Chromium, Lead, Nickel, Vinyl chloride, Zinc). Conclusion: This is a first step to derive new Canadian EDIs integrating all the pertinent information available. However, through this systematic and transparent process a lot of limitations can be identified (data gaps, methodological limitations, no available correlations between media of exposure, etc). This allows prioritization of future research projects to improve Health Canada EDIs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.349
GPT teacher head0.508
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpidemiologySame topicRadioactivity and Radon MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207