MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325105969 · doi:10.1021/tx5000409

Reactive Metabolite Trapping Screens and Potential Pitfalls: Bioactivation of a Homomorpholine and Formation of an Unstable Thiazolidine Adduct

2014· article· en· W2325105969 on OpenAlexaff
Eva M. Lenz, Scott Martin, Ralf Schmidt, Pierre-Emmanuel Morin, Robin Smith, Daniel J. Weston, Malken Bayrakdarian

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Research in Toxicology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsAstraZeneca (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdductChemistryGlutathioneThiazolidineReactive intermediateMetaboliteStereochemistryCysteineCovalent bondNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyCarcinogenCombinatorial chemistryBiochemistryEnzymeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Successful early attrition of potential problematic compounds is of great importance in the pharmaceutical industry. The lead compound in a recent project targeting neuropathic pain was susceptible to metabolic bioactivation, which produced reactive metabolites and showed covalent binding to protein. Therefore, as a part of the backup series for this compound several structural modifications were explored to mediate the reactive metabolite and covalent binding risk. A homomorpholine containing series of compounds was identified without compromising potency. However, when these compounds were incubated with human liver microsomes in the presence of GSH, Cys-Gly adducts were identified, instead of intact GSH conjugates. This article examines the formation of the Cys-Gly adduct with AZX ([M+H]+ 486) as a representative compound for this series. The AZX-Cys-Gly-adduct ([M+H]+ 662) showed evidence of ring contraction by formation of a thiazolidine-glycine and was additionally shown to be unstable. During its isolation for structural characterization by 1H NMR spectroscopy, it was found to have decomposed to a product with [M+H]+ 446. The characterization and identification of this labile GSH-derived adduct using LC-MS/MS and 1H NMR are described, along with observations around stability. In addition, various structurally related trapping reagents were employed in an attempt to further investigate the reaction mechanism along with a methoxylamine trapping experiment to confirm the structure of the postulated reactive intermediate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.201
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Research in ToxicologySame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207