MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325118962 · doi:10.1061/40711(141)13

Design and Construction of a Multi-Use Apron Facility for Code F Aircraft at Vancouver International Airport

2004· article· en· W2325118962 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
George Nowak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAir Traffic Management and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternational airportEngineeringSettlement (finance)Civil engineeringTransport engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vancouver International Airport (YVR) is Canada's second busiest airport, with some 15.5 million passengers and 274,400 aircraft movements in 2001. It is also the second largest international passenger gateway on the west coast of North America. It is a premier gateway to Asia and has been involved in an aggressive program of terminal and airside expansion since 1992. As part of its next major international terminal expansion, which will ultimately include six new Code F gates, YVR required a new remote apron which would act as an aircraft staging area to feed the terminal incorporating three deicing pads for Code E and Code F aircraft, remote cargo loading and refueling capabilities. The West Apron Expansion project combines 74,500m2 (802,000 S.F.) of rigid and flexible pavement structures, an extensive subsurface stormwater and deicing fluid collection system, low-visibility inset lighting for CAT III conditions and high-mast floodlighting to provide unobstructed parking and power-in/power-out maneuvering for Code E and F aircraft. This paper describes the West Apron Expansion project as an engineering and construction case study. The major pavement design elements included: geometry for Code F aircraft maneuvering; staged preloading of the site to induce long-term settlement on the weak (CBR 2) river delta deposits where YVR is founded; rigid pavement structures for the main parking and taxi lanes; rigid pavement panel sizes to suit gear tracks of the new large aircraft and adjustments for over 230 inset lights; grading and drainage plan suitable for apron parking and rapid removal of deicing fluids; and, flexible pavement structures with hot mix asphaltic concrete surfaces and cement-stabilized base courses for smaller remote aircraft loading. The main construction issues included multi-stage preloading to minimize imported subbase, seven construction stages to minimize operational impact on adjacent pavements, quality control management by the contractor and rigid pavement construction using fixed form paving without internal vibrators. The construction encompassed six main contracts completed over a two-year period ending in early 2002.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAir Traffic Management and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207