MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325143706 · doi:10.1149/1.3378971

Protons: Affinity and Reduction in Ionic Liquids

2010· article· en· W2325143706 on OpenAlexaff
Keith E. Johnson, Gordon W. Driver

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic and Organometallic Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersÅbo Akademi
KeywordsChemistryProtonationHalideAcetonitrileProtic solventSolventMoleculeProtonDissociation (chemistry)AnhydrousAffinitiesInorganic chemistryProton affinityIonPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proton affinities dictate that protic salts are dissociated into molecules in the gas phase. In the liquid phase, protons are associated with charge neutral base molecules or homoconjugate/heteroconjugate anions. For example, liquids prepared from a base and a hydrogen halide contain the protonated base and either the halide or the halohydrogenate(I) anion; thus 2 classes of proton may be available for reduction. It happens that the anionic protic species are more readily reduced. This situation extends to complex hydrogen halides and anhydrous carboxylic acids. NMR data provide evidence of proton transfer and spectrophotometry can give a measure of acidity. Protic species alone may or may not ionize, depending on the proton affinity of the species itself. The formation of salts from base and protic species is discussed in terms of the pair of dissociation constants for dimethylsulphoxide, acetonitrile, water, and the gas phase, with limitations imposed by solvent leveling noted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicInorganic and Organometallic ChemistryFrench-language works237,207