MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325157935 · doi:10.3749/canmin.49.3.691

DIAMOND CRYSTALS AND THEIR MINERAL INCLUSIONS FROM THE LYNX KIMBERLITE DYKE COMPLEX, CENTRAL QUEBEC

2011· article· en· W2325157935 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Adrian Van Rythoven, Tom E. McCandless, D. J. Schulze, Anthony J. Bellis, L. A. Taylor, Y. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsKimberliteGeologyMineralDiamondGeochemistryMineralogyMaterials scienceMetallurgyMantle (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lynx is a 522 Ma kimberlite dyke complex located in the Otish Mountains of central Quebec, Canada. Test sampling of the Lynx kimberlite yielded 6598 macrodiamond samples from 528 t of kimberlite. Single crystals strongly dominate the population, with only 14% of the macrodiamond portion consisting of macles and aggregates. Within the single crystals, 41% are dominated by octahedral surface features, and the remaining ones are partially resorbed tetrahexahedroida. Brown is the most common color among the tetrahexahedroida, with only 22% gray to colorless stones comprising the remainder. In contrast, the octahedra are roughly equal in numbers of brown, gray and colorless stones. A subset of twenty stones was selected in the −11 to +3 DTC (0.256 c to 0.67 c) range of circular sieve sizes on the basis of visible inclusions. These have octahedral primary growth-forms and include three macles and three aggregates of octahedra. Most of the samples are significantly resorbed; they range from octahedra with rounded corners and edges to tetrahexahedroida. Shield laminae, serrate laminae, and hillocks are the most common resorption-related surface features. The stones were cut and polished along single planes to expose mineral inclusions for analysis and to allow imaging of internal structure of the diamond relative to the inclusions. Cathodoluminescence imaging revealed deformation lamellae in most of the polished crystals. Some exhibit deformation lamellae truncated by growth or resorption zones or intersections of different crystallographic planes. Oscillatory patterns of planar growth with complex cores are most common. Inclusions, particularly of olivine, typically occur in core and early growth regions of the diamond crystals. Primary inclusions exposed by polishing are magnesian olivine, chromian diopside, chromian pyropic garnet, magnesian orthopyroxene, omphacite, and sulfide. The chromian diopside inclusions yield equilibration conditions in the range of 58–60 kbar and 1250–1280°C that correspond to conditions slightly below a 42 mW/m2 surface heat-flow geothermal gradient. The most iron-rich olivine inclusion (mg# = 0.916) occurs with the diopside inclusions, suggesting a relatively fertile lherzolitic component of mantle at 180–190 km depth. The garnet data indicate that within the peridotite parentage, both harzburgitic (three G10, 12.4–13.7 wt.% Cr2O3, 3.7–4.4 wt.% CaO) and lherzolitic (one G9, 8.9 wt.% Cr2O3, 5.8 wt.% CaO) parageneses are present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207