<i>In Vivo</i> Self-Assembly of Fluorescent Protein Microparticles Displaying Specific Binding Domains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, fluorescent proteins (FPs) were engineered to self-assemble into protein particles inside recombinant Escherichia coli while mediating the display of various protein functionalities such as maltose binding protein or IgG binding domains of Protein A or G, respectively. Escherichia coli produced functional FP particles of up to 30% of cellular dry weight. The use of respective FP particles displaying certain binding domains in diagnostics and as bioseparation resins was demonstrated by direct comparison to commercial offerings. It was demonstrated that variable extensions (AVTS, FHKP, LAVG, or TS) of the N-terminus of FPs (GFP, YFP, CFP, HcRed) in combination with large C-terminal extensions such as translational fusion of the polyester synthase from Ralstonia eutropha or an aldolase from Escherichia coli led to extensive intracellular self-assembly of strongly fluorescent fusion protein particles of oval shape (0.5×1 μm). The strong fluorescent label of these bioparticles in combination with covalent display of protein functions provides a molecular toolbox for the design of self-assembled microparticles suitable for antibody-capture or ligand binding based diagnostic assays as well as the high affinity purification of target compounds such as antibodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".