Exploitation of the Catalytic Site and 150 Cavity for Design of Influenza A Neuraminidase Inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report here the exploitation of the 150 cavity in the active site of influenza A viral neuraminidases for the design of novel C-6 triazole-containing Tamiflu derivatives. A general and convenient synthetic route was developed by utilizing a highly substituted cyclic Baylis-Hillman acetate as an active precursor for azide substitution via suprafacial allylic azide [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement. Virus replication inhibitory assays in vitro of these triazole derivatives containing either an amino or guanidino function indicated that the guanidinium compound showed the higher efficacy against a strain with N2 subtype at a concentration of 2 × 10(-5) M but did not inhibit replication of a strain with N1 subtype even at a concentration of 10(-4) M. In order to probe the nature of the enzyme-inhibitor interactions, molecular dynamics simulations were performed on complexes of these compounds with different neuraminidase enzymes. The results indicated that the candidate inhibitors occupy both the 150 cavity and catalytic site but with alternating occupancy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".