MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325279924 · doi:10.1038/protex.2013.006

Purification and processing of blood-forming tissue units, the haematons, in searching for mammalian stem cell niches

2013· article· en· W2325279924 on OpenAlexfundno aff
I Blazsek, Denis Clay, Philippe Leclerc, József Blazsek, Jean‐Jacques Candelier, Csaba Dobó‐Nagy, Ibrahim Khazaal, Bruno Péault, Georges Uzan, Marie‐Caroline Le Bousse‐Kerdilès

Bibliographic record

VenueProtocol Exchange · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de GenèveInstitute of Cancer ResearchInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsNicheStem cellBiologyEcological nicheStem cell nicheCell biologyProgenitor cellEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-renewing organs in adult mammals are composed of numerous tissue-speci c functional units, such as intestinal crypts/villi or hair follicles, which all involve stem cell \(SC) niches.Analogous tissue units in haematopoietic systems, however, have remained elusive.We design here a step-by-step protocol for in situ mapping, puri cation, enumeration and structural-functional analysis of the haematopoietic tissue unit, termed haematon.Longitudinal bisection of mouse femur and careful, limited dispersion of bone marrow \(BM) parenchyma reveals compact, node-like haematons at discreet capillary loops along the diaphysis and spongy metaphysis.Recovery and fractionation of the whole BM in a bulk cell suspension, haematon units and endosteal layer provides a reproducible tool for quantitative and topographical analysis of putative SC niches in de ned tissue compartments.We show examples how to characterize haematons in native state or following long-term culture using laser-scanning confocal microscopy, ow cytometry, clonal bioassays and videomicroscopy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProtocol ExchangeSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207