MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325284411 · doi:10.1049/iet-pel.2015.0012

Real‐time simulation of modular multilevel converters for controller hardware‐in‐the‐loop testing

2015· article· en· W2325284411 on OpenAlexaff
Mahmoud Matar, Dominic Paradis, Reza Iravani

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Power Electronics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsThe Wilson CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designConvertersHardware-in-the-loop simulationController (irrigation)Loop (graph theory)Computer scienceComputer hardwareEmbedded systemEngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematicsOperating systemVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents a field programmable gate array (FPGA)‐based real‐time simulation platform for realistic‐size modular multilevel converters (MMCs). This development is primarily intended for controller hardware‐in‐the‐loop (HIL) testing for MMC‐based high‐voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission systems. Although the real‐time simulation of MMC‐based systems is particularly challenging due to the presence of thousands of power electronic switches, yet, it is still possible based on adopting a computationally efficient MMC model and the use of a high‐performance parallel computational engine. This study focuses on the design and implementation of the parallel computational engine that solves the mathematical model of an enhanced computationally efficient MMC model on the FPGA platform. Moreover, provided are the implementation results and their verifications corresponding to the real‐time simulation of a 401‐level MMC and the HIL testing of the controllers of the 401‐level MMC‐HVDC link between France and Spain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Power ElectronicsSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207