Programming Membrane Fusion and Subsequent Apoptosis into Mammalian Cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By the delivery of specific natural or engineered proteins, mammalian cells can be programmed to perform increasingly sophisticated and useful functions. Here, we introduce a set of proteins that has potential value in cell-based therapies by programming a cell to target tumor cells. First, the delivery of VSV-G (vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein) allowed the cell to undergo membrane fusion with adjacent cells to form syncytia (i.e., a multinucleated cell) in conditions of low pH typically occurring at a tumor site. The formation of syncytia caused the clustering of nuclei along with an integration of the microtubule network and ER. Interestingly, the formation of syncytia between cells that are dynamically blebbing, a mode of migration preferred during tumor metastasis, resulted in the loss of these morphology changes. Lastly, the codelivery of VSV-G with L57R (an engineered photoactivated caspase-7) allowed cells to undergo low pH-dependent membrane fusion followed by blue light-dependent apoptosis. In cell-based therapies, the clearance of syncytia between tumor cells might further trigger an immune response against the tumor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it