MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325452267 · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.12110

Structural basis for a novel interaction between <scp>TXNIP</scp> and Vav2

2016· article· en· W2325452267 on OpenAlexafffund
Shasha Liu, Xue Wu, Minru Zong, W. Tempel, P. Loppnau, Yanli Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRedox biology and oxidative stress
Canadian institutionsStructural Genomics ConsortiumUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaOntario Ministry of Economic Development and InnovationWellcome TrustGenome CanadaOntario Genomics InstituteCentral China Normal UniversityAbbVieCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWellcomeGlaxoSmithKlineTakeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.PfizerBoehringer Ingelheim
KeywordsTXNIPPhosphorylationUbiquitin ligaseCell biologyUbiquitinThioredoxin-Interacting ProteinImmunoprecipitationBiologyTyrosine phosphorylationChemistryBiochemistryThioredoxinGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) is a multifunctional protein involved in diverse cellular processes such as cell proliferation and apoptosis. TXNIP stability is controlled by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Itch directly interacts with TXNIP via PPxY motifs of TXNIP. In a previously published study, we have shown that phosphorylation of the PPxY tyrosyl residue switches TXNIP selectivity between different binding partners. Here, we describe that tyrosine-phosphorylated PPxY motifs also bind to SH2 domains of Vav2 and Src with dissociation constants around 10 μm and that phosphorylation is indispensable for these interactions as well. The crystal structure of the complex between a phosphorylated PPxY motif, and the SH2 domain of Vav2 reveals a conserved recognition mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicRedox biology and oxidative stressFrench-language works237,207