Comparison of Three-Rod Bundle Data With Existing Heat-Transfer Correlations for Bare Vertical Tubes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many heat-transfer correlations exist for bare tubes cooled with SuperCritical Water (SCW). However, there is very few correlations that describe SCW heat transfer in bundles. Due to the lack of extensive data on bundles, a limited dataset on heat transfer in a SCW-cooled bundle was studied and analyzed using existing bare-tube correlations to find the best-fit correlation. This dataset was obtained by Razumovskiy et al. (National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI”) in SCW flowing upward in a vertical annular channel (1-rod channel) and tight 3-rod bundle consisting of tubes of 5.2-mm outside diameter and 485-mm heated length. The heat-transfer data were obtained at pressures of 22.5, 24.5, and 27.5 MPa, mass flux within a range from 800 to 3000 kg/m2s, inlet temperature from 125 to 352°C, outlet temperature up to 372°C and heat flux up to 4.6 MW/m2. The objective of this study is to compare bare-tube SCW heat-transfer correlations with the data on 1- and 3-rod bundles. This work is in support of SuperCritical Water-cooled Reactors (SCWRs) as one of the six concepts of Generation-IV nuclear systems. SCWRs will operate at pressures of ∼25MPa and inlet temperatures of 350°C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it