MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325504707 · doi:10.1021/ma301447f

PDMS–Fluorous Polyoxetane–PDMS Triblock Hybrid Elastomers: Tough and Transparent with Novel Bulk Morphologies

2012· article· en· W2325504707 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicone and Siloxane Chemistry
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMaterials scienceElastomerMicroscale chemistryPolymerPhase (matter)Morphology (biology)ModulusComposite materialChemical engineeringElastic modulusPolydimethylsiloxaneToughnessMiscibilityPolymer chemistryChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PDMS-3F-1.1-PDMS and PDMS-3F-4.5-PDMS triblock hybrid elastomers are investigated, wherein (1) 3F-1.1 and 3F-4.5 are poly(3-methyl-3-trifluoroethoxymethyl)-1,3-propylene oxide with M n = 1.1 or 4.5 kDa, (2) segments are linked by urethane/urea forming reactions, and (3) the intermediate PDMS-3F-PDMS aminopropyl end segments are end-capped with isocyanatopropyltriethoxysilane. After condensation cure, PDMS-3F-PDMS triblock hybrids (A-1.1 and A-4.5) form robust elastomers. In a second set, bis(triethoxysilylethane), BTESE, was incorporated to probe effects of increased siliceous domain content (B-1.1, B-4.5). All compositions are optically transparent due to nearly identical refractive indexes for 3F and PDMS segments. TM-AFM images for A-4.5, A-1.1, and B-4.5 fracture surfaces reveal microscale bulk phase separation. The A-4.5 triblock hybrid shows a particularly interesting morphology comprised of 2–3 μm ovaloids (low modulus) surrounded by a higher modulus matrix. A model is proposed for this microscale morphology based on the relative rates of physical network formation (PN, H-bonding) and chemical network formation (CN, SiO 1.5 ) during coating deposition Despite low hard segment weight percents (2.6–3.5) the hybrid triblocks have moderate toughness with strain at break ranging from 260 to 492%. Triblock hybrid elastomer B-1.1 has the highest −SiO 1.5 wt % (mostly from BTESE) and lowest 3F wt % (3F-1.1). No sign of microscale phase separation is observed by TM-AFM imaging, and a separate T g for the 3F segment is not detected by DMA; these findings are ascribed to network constrained phase separation of that results in 3F being incorporated in an “interphase”. The absence of a separate T g for 3F leads to a gradual decrease in storage modulus (8 to 1.4 MPa) from −90 to 150 °C. In contrast to the complex bulk morphology, TM-AFM imaging shows the hybrid surfaces are devoid of microstructural features attributable to phase separation. Based on contact angle measurements and XPS analysis, the outermost surface for all PDMS-3F-PDMS hybrid triblocks elastomers is dominated by PDMS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it