Impaired superficial femoral artery vasodilation and leg blood flow in young obese women following an oral glucose tolerance test
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was designed to test the hypothesis that glucose ingestion following an overnight fast increases leg vascular conductance (LVCd) and superficial femoral artery (SFA) vasodilation in lean but not obese young women. Obese (23.5 ± 4.0 years, 84.7 ± 14.7 kg, 37.2% ± 6.4% fat; mean ± SD, n = 8) and lean (23.8 ± 2.4 years, 60.6 ± 4.0 kg, 22.3% ± 2.8% fat; n = 8) women arrived in the laboratory at 0830 h after a 12-h overnight fast for body composition (densitometry) assessment. Then, capillary blood glucose (BGlu), plasma insulin, heart rate, cardiac output, mean arterial pressure, leg blood flow (Doppler ultrasound), and LVCd were measured (after 15 min in the supine position), and at 30-min intervals for 2 h following glucose ingestion (75 g glucose load, 12.5% solution). Fasting BGlu concentration was not different between groups (obese = 5.1 ± 0.47 vs. lean = 4.9 ± 0.37 mmol·L(-1), p = 0.71) but 60, 90, and 120 min post ingestion BGlu was elevated (p ≤ 0.03) in the obese women. Insulin differences were not significant. Fasting LVCd was not different between groups (lean = 0.72 ± 0.49 vs. obese = 0.70 ± 0.19 mL·min(-1)·mm Hg(-1); p = 0.48); however, LVCd, as well as Δ in SFA diameter were significantly elevated (p ≤ 0.04) in the lean compared with the obese group at 60, 90, and 120 min postglucose ingestion (LVCd, peak lean = 1.4 ± 0.5 vs. peak obese = 0.8 ± 0.1 mL·min(-1)·mm Hg(-1); Δ in SFA, peak lean = 0.51 ± 0.30 vs. peak obese = 0.09 ± 0.45 mm). The reduced LVCd following glucose ingestion could contribute to impaired glucose tolerance. Further, the lack of SFA dilation may be evidence of impaired vascular insulin responsiveness in these obese young women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".