MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Incidence of Class II DSA According to Mismatched Alleles Is Affected by Calcineurin Inhibitor Drug Levels

2012· article· en· W2325627581 on OpenAlexaff
Luis Hidalgo, Donald F. LeGatt, Monika Oliver, Pam Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Alberta Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCalcineurinUrologyHuman leukocyte antigenPopulationTacrolimusIncidence (geometry)Kidney transplantationGastroenterologyInternal medicineAntigenTransplantationKidney diseaseKidneySurgeryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Donor specific antibodies (DSA) to mismatched HLA class II antigens remain a barrier to long term kidney graft survival. We investigated the relationship of de novo class II DSA generation calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) levels, and graft survival in kidney transplantation. Methods: Class II DSA and CNI (tacrolimus (TAC), cyclosporin (CS)) levels were compared in 472 kidney transplant recipients undergoing DSA testing post-transplant. Patients were subdivided into three groups according to CNI levels measured within the year prior to the time of DSA testing: Normal - TAC>4/CS>75 (N=299), Low - TAC=3-4/CS=50-75 (N=86), Very Low - TAC< 3/CS< 50 (N=87). The incidence of DSA was calculated for each class II locus (HLA-DRB1, -DRB3/4/5, and -DQB1) as a percent of the times that locus was mismatched in each group. DSA to DRB1 in patients with Low or Very Low CNI levels were combined due to the low number of these antibodies in the Low CNI group. Results: As a percent of the number of mismatched antigens, the highest incidence of DSA in this patient population was against DQ7/8/9, followed by DQ2, DQ4, DQ5/6, DRB3/4/5, and DRB1 DSA (Figure 1). The highest incidence of DSA was observed in patients with very low CNI levels who developed DSA against DQ7/8/9 56.7% of the time these antigens were mismatched. The incidence of DQ7/8/9 and DQ4 DSA dramatically decreased with increasing CNI levels whereas DQ2 DSA and DQ5/6 DSA decreased modestly. The incidence of DSA to HLA-DR loci did not change with CNI levels.[FIGURE 1]We also examined the effect of DSA specificities on graft loss. The incidence of DSA to the class II loci indicated above was repeated but only including patients who had lost their grafts (N=103). Within this cohort the incidence of DSA was again highest for DQ7/8/9 DSA (61.8%), followed by DQ2, DQ5/6, DQ4, DRB1, and DRB3/4/5 (Table 1).[TABLE 1. DSA IN PATIENTS WITH GRAFT LOSS]Conclusion: Our data suggest that higher CNI levels may help decrease the incidence of class II DSA to certain mismatched loci and also lower the increased risk of graft loss. Further work may allow for target CNI levels to be customized for kidney transplant patients based on mismatched donor HLA class II antigens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207