Design and Development of Active Cord Mechanism "ACM-R3" and its 3-dimensional Locomotion Control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research considers the mechanism design of the“Active Cord Mechanism (ACM) ”, which is a long and slender snake-type functional object that can perform three-dimensional movement. We designed a three dimensional ACM machine named ACM-R3 that can produce large output torque in spite of its small dimensions and light weight, and considered its three-dimensional steering control of two-dimensional serpentine locomotion. The meaning of steering in this research is the route change around the circumference of yaw, pitch and roll axes. Furthermore, novel propulsion forms, such as“Serpentine Locomotion with Lateral-Rolling” (whose control method is based on the steering of the roll axis) and“Sinus-Lifting Locomotion” (which is a special form of pitch axis steering) are examined. The latest model ACM-R3 was used to actually implement, for the first time ever, these new propulsion methods, and also to examine the motion ability experiemntally by measuring the torque produced at each node.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".