MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325674705 · doi:10.1190/ice2016-6283742.1

Tectonic and climatic controls on facies distribution in the Jurassic Walloon coal measures, Surat basin, Australia

2016· article· en· W2325674705 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carmine C. Wainman, Peter J. McCabe

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference and Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain, 3-6 April 2016 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTectonicsGeologyFaciesStructural basinCoalCoal basinCoal measuresGeomorphologyGeochemistryDistribution (mathematics)PaleontologyCoal miningArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Walloon Coal Measures of the Surat Basin, eastern Australia were deposited during the Oxfordian (Upper Jurassic) at a high latitude (<75oS). New precise dates for accumulation of the strata reveal new insights into the relative roles of tectonism and climate on the vertical distribution of sedimentary facies within the formation. The formation is up to 500m thick and consists of fluvial and lacustrine strata with coal beds. Although coal constitutes 5% of the formation, coal beds are thin (mostly <0.4m) and laterally discontinuous (most coal beds can be correlated for <5km). This creates problems for effective exploration and production in what is the largest coal bed methane play in Australia. Numerous volcanic tuffs interbedded with coals in the formation provide a unique opportunity to examine variations in subsidence rates through time with high resolution. Zircons from six volcanic tuffs have been dated from one vertical section using the CA-TIMS method to an error margin of <100kyr. The formation can be split into four units of differing subsidence rates. There is a marked decrease in the percentage of sandstone (between 0.5 and 0.3) between the units that were deposited under low subsidence rates compared to those deposited under high subsidence rates. By contrast, the percentage of coal between the units is constant and, furthermore, the thickness of coal beds is essentially the same throughout the formation. This implies that the subsidence rate was not a critical factor in determining the nature of coal/peat accumulation. The thin nature of the coal beds is most likely related to frequent fluctuations in climate with intermittent episodes favourable for peat accumulation. Alternatively frequent base level changes, related to changes in relative sea level, may have created intermittent conditions suitable for peat accumulation. Other high-latitude coals, such as those in the Cretaceous of Arctic Canada and Antarctica are also thin and it is suggested that the sensitivity of such latitudes to global climate change may be a causal mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference and Exhibition, Barcelona, Spain, 3-6 April 2016Same topicCoal Properties and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207