Apoptotic and Proliferative Defects Characterize Ocular Development in a Microphthalmic BMP Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Vision is critically dependent on ocular size, which is regulated by environmental and genetic factors. Mutation of human Growth and Differentiation Factor 6 (GDF6) or zebrafish gdf6a results in a spectrum of small eye phenotypes (microphthalmia, anophthalmia, and coloboma). However, current models do not explain their etiology fully. As such, analyses of apoptosis and cell cycle regulation were undertaken in a zebrafish gdf6a mutant. METHODS: Microarray analysis was performed at 2 days after fertilization to uncover novel gdf6a-dependent cell cycle regulators. Altered expression of Gdf6a targets was confirmed by in situ hybridization, and resulting changes in cell proliferation were assessed by phosphohistone H3 immunohistochemistry. Analysis of apoptosis was evaluated through activated Caspase 3 immunohistochemistry and chemical inhibitors of cell death. RESULTS: Reduced numbers of retinal progenitor cells are observed at 24 hours post fertilization (hpf), resulting in microphthalmic eyes in gdf6a(-/-) embryos. At 28 hpf, a wave of apoptosis occurs; however, apoptosis inhibition does not rescue eye size, indicating a limited contribution. Mutants display altered proliferation and expression levels of cell cycle regulators, including members of the forkhead box i (foxi) transcription factor family expressed in the ciliary marginal zone. Notably, inhibition of foxi2 in gdf6a(-/-) embryos further reduces eye size. CONCLUSIONS: These data support a model whereby the gdf6a(-/-)-induced microphthalmia is based on early regulation of retinal progenitor cell number, and later by regulation of proliferation in the ciliary marginal zone. Foxi genes represent downstream effectors of Gdf6a function in the CMZ required for eye size determination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".