MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325804615 · doi:10.1093/icvts/ivt288.204

P-204COMBINED APPROACH FOR RESECTION OF RESIDUAL THORACIC AND RETROPERITONEAL MASSES AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY FOR METASTATIC NON-SEMINOMATOUS GERM CELL TUMOURS

2013· article· en· W2325804615 on OpenAlexaff
Donna Eaton, Andrea Mariscal, Michael A.S. Jewett, Robert J. Hamilton, Philippe L. Bédard, Malcolm J. Moore, Marc de Perrot

Bibliographic record

VenueInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThoracotomyMediastinumLaparotomySurgeryRetroperitoneal spaceAbdomenPerioperativeCardiothoracic surgeryChemotherapyRadiologyGerm cell tumors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resection of residual masses after chemotherapy is advocated for metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT) since residual masses may contain viable tumour and/or teratoma. However, a combined approach for resection of residual thoracic and retroperitoneal disease has rarely been reported. We therefore reviewed our experience to determine the potential advantages of a combined approach to access the abdomen and chest simultaneously. We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing thoracic surgery for metastatic NSGCT between January 2005 and Decemer 2012 in our institution. All patients received cisplatin-based chemotherapy before surgery. Out of 48 patients undergoing thoracic surgery for metastatic NSGCT, 20 had a combined approach to the chest and abdomen, 16 had a sequential approach to the chest and abdomen, and 12 had an isolated thoracic procedure. Patients undergoing a combined approach presented predominantly with mediastinal disease (15 out of 20 patients, 75%) while patients undergoing a sequential approach presented more frequently with pulmonary disease alone (11 out of 16 patients, 69%) (P = 0.02). Among patients undergoing a combined approach, the laparotomy was combined with a sternotomy (n = 12), a thoracotomy (n = 5), or a transdiaphragmatic approach (n = 3). The sternolaparotomy was combined with a transpericardial approach to access tumour located below the subcarinal space in the mid visceral mediastinum (n = 5) and/or a transdiaphragmatic approach for tumours located in the lower visceral mediastinum (n = 2). No perioperative death was recorded and all patients were discharged home. At follow-up, 3 patients developed recurrence, including one in the chest. Combined approach to the chest and abdomen for resection of residual masses after chemotherapy for metastatic NSGCT can be safely performed. A sternolaparotomy is particularly beneficial in patients presenting with residual retroperitoneal and mediastinal disease located in the upper, middle and/or lower mediastinum. All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic SurgerySame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207