MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325843513 · doi:10.1021/ja306047u

Interrogating Near-Infrared Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence of Au<sub>25</sub>(SC<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>Ph)<sub>18</sub><sup>+</sup> Clusters

2012· article· en· W2325843513 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanocluster Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryExcited stateSpectroscopyPhotoluminescenceHOMO/LUMOChemiluminescenceNear-infrared spectroscopyGround statePhotochemistryLuminescenceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MoleculeAtomic physicsOptoelectronicsPhysical chemistryOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrochemistry, near-infrared photoluminescence (NIR-PL) spectroscopy, and electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) of Au(25)(SC(2)H(4)Ph)(18)(+)C(6)F(5)CO(2)(-) (Au(25)(+)) clusters were investigated. For the first time, NIR-ECL emission was observed in both annihilation and coreactant paths. Our newly developed spooling spectroscopy was employed during the ECL evolution and devolution processes along with explicit NIR-PL spectroscopy to elucidate light generation mechanisms. It was discovered that the electronic relaxation of the Au(25)(-) excited state to the ground state plays a key role in giving off ECL at 893 nm, while intermediate, strong, and weak NIR-PL emissions at 719/820, 857, and 1080 nm can be attributed to the excited states higher than the HOMO-LUMO gap, across the HOMO-LUMO gap, and of semi-rings, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it