MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325862463 · doi:10.3138/cras-s030-03-02

“Modern Marriage” for African Americans, 1920–1940

2000· article· en· W2325862463 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christina Simmons

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Review of American Studies · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarrSisterRomanceAsideBrotherBeautyWhite (mutation)Queen (butterfly)Character (mathematics)Art historyHistoryLiteratureHollywoodArtClassicsSociologyAnthropologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Between January 1925 and June 1926 the New York Messenger ran a serialized romance story entitled “The Letters of Davy Carr.” The story, set in Washington, DC, centres on the youngest daughter of the middle-class Rhodes family. Caro­line Rhodes, a grade-school teacher and a dark and lively beauty with “all the best and worst points of the modern flapper,” alternately fascinates and horrifies the priggish narrator, Davy Carr (Anonymous, Jan. 1925 26). Carr purports to be a well-educated twenty-something man, native of a “little provincial Southern city,” sojourning in Washington, DC, in 1922 to do research for a book on the slave trade. While boarding with the Rhodeses, Carr writes letters to a his war buddy back in New York, describing “colored society” in the nation’s capital, with a focus on the fascinating Caroline (Mar. 1925 146; Apr. 1925 165). Fussed over by her “Victorian” mother and elder sister, Caroline smokes and constantly visits Carr’s room to chat. He describes how she sat in his room, swinging her silk-clad legs with the abandon of a small boy, and regaled [him] in terms piquant and interesting, if a trifle startling at times, with her very mod­ern views of the woman question, fellows, and marriage … it was decidedly refreshing, but I am not sure that it was not more shocking than anything else. (Jan. 1925 27)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Review of American StudiesSame topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207