GlycoMaster DB: Software To Assist the Automated Identification of N-Linked Glycopeptides by Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glycosylation is one of the most commonly observed post-translational modifications (PTMs) in eukaryotes. It is believed that more than 50% eukaryotic proteins are glycosylated. To reveal the biological functions of protein-linked glycans involved in numerous biological processes, the high-throughput identification of both glycoproteins and the attached glycan structures becomes fundamentally important. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is an effective method for glycoproteomic analysis because of its high sensitivity and selectivity. Two experimental approaches exist to obtain MS/MS spectral data of glycopeptides. One consists of isolating glycans from glycopeptides and generating MS/MS spectra of the glycans and peptides separately. The other approach produces spectra directly from intact glycopeptides. The latter approach has the advantage of retaining the glycosylation site information. However, the spectral data cannot be readily analyzed because of the lack of software specifically designed for the identification of intact glycopeptides. To address this need, we developed a novel software tool, GlycoMaster DB, to assist the automated and high-throughput identification of intact N-linked glycopeptides from MS/MS spectra. The software simultaneously searches a protein sequence database and a glycan structure database to find the best pair of peptide and glycan for each input spectrum. GlycoMaster DB can analyze mass spectral data produced with HCD/ETD mixed fragmentation, where HCD spectra are used to identify glycans and ETD spectra are used to determine peptide sequences. When only HCD spectra are available, GlycoMaster DB can still help to identify the glycans, and a list of possible peptide sequences are reported according to the accurate precursor mass and the N-linked glycopeptide sequon. GlycoMaster DB is freely accessible at http://www-novo.cs.uwaterloo.ca:8080/GlycoMasterDB .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".