MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2325899314 · doi:10.1021/pr401115y

GlycoMaster DB: Software To Assist the Automated Identification of N-Linked Glycopeptides by Tandem Mass Spectrometry

2014· article· en· W2325899314 on OpenAlexafffund
He Lin, Lei Xin, Baozhen Shan, Gilles Lajoie, Bin Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityBioinformatics Solutions (Canada)University of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGlycanGlycopeptideTandem mass spectrometryGlycosylationChemistryMass spectrometryComputational biologyPeptideGlycoproteinChromatographyBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glycosylation is one of the most commonly observed post-translational modifications (PTMs) in eukaryotes. It is believed that more than 50% eukaryotic proteins are glycosylated. To reveal the biological functions of protein-linked glycans involved in numerous biological processes, the high-throughput identification of both glycoproteins and the attached glycan structures becomes fundamentally important. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is an effective method for glycoproteomic analysis because of its high sensitivity and selectivity. Two experimental approaches exist to obtain MS/MS spectral data of glycopeptides. One consists of isolating glycans from glycopeptides and generating MS/MS spectra of the glycans and peptides separately. The other approach produces spectra directly from intact glycopeptides. The latter approach has the advantage of retaining the glycosylation site information. However, the spectral data cannot be readily analyzed because of the lack of software specifically designed for the identification of intact glycopeptides. To address this need, we developed a novel software tool, GlycoMaster DB, to assist the automated and high-throughput identification of intact N-linked glycopeptides from MS/MS spectra. The software simultaneously searches a protein sequence database and a glycan structure database to find the best pair of peptide and glycan for each input spectrum. GlycoMaster DB can analyze mass spectral data produced with HCD/ETD mixed fragmentation, where HCD spectra are used to identify glycans and ETD spectra are used to determine peptide sequences. When only HCD spectra are available, GlycoMaster DB can still help to identify the glycans, and a list of possible peptide sequences are reported according to the accurate precursor mass and the N-linked glycopeptide sequon. GlycoMaster DB is freely accessible at http://www-novo.cs.uwaterloo.ca:8080/GlycoMasterDB .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207