Growth of Cosmic Dust Aggregates and Reexamination of Particle Interaction Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dust growth is the first step of planet formation in protoplanetary disks. Dust growth also influences the temperature of protoplanetary disks. However, we still have a large uncertainty in the dust growth process. This uncertainty mainly comes from unknown factors in dust internal structure and collisional outcomes. The dust structure and the collisional outcome would be closely related with each other. In recent years, many theoretical studies on aggregate collisions and growth have been done. In the present paper, we introduce remarkable results in these theoretical studies, mainly focusing on numerical simulations of dust collisions by our group. In the numerical simulations of dust collisions, we adopt the interaction model between constituent particles of dust aggregates. We have started the rexamination of the particle interaction model, by performing molecular dymnamics simulation of particle collisions. We also report the preliminary results of our molecular dynamics simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it