MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326090536 · doi:10.3749/canmin.51.1.93

Wopmayite, Ideally Ca6Na3 Mn(Po4)3(PO3Oh)4, A New Phosphate Mineral From The Tanco Mine, Bernic Lake, Manitoba: Description And Crystal Structure

2013· article· en· W2326090536 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralPhosphateGeologyGeochemistryPhosphate mineralsMineralogyMaterials scienceChemistryMetallurgyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wopmayite, ideally Ca 6 Na 3 □Mn(PO 4 ) 3 (PO 3 OH) 4 , is a new secondary mineral from the Tanco mine, Bernic Lake, Manitoba. It occurs in vugs in a single 5–10 cm mass of phosphate-carbonate mineralization in a spodumene-rich boulder found in the dumps of the Tanco Mine, Bernic Lake, Manitoba, Canada. It is a secondary mineral that crystallized together with rhodochrosite, quartz, whitlockite, apatite, and other phases after dissolution of primary lithiophosphate by hydrothermal solutions. The initial crystal of wopmayite was a corroded {1011} rhomb ∼150 microns across. Wopmayite is colorless to white to pale pink with a white streak and a vitreous luster, and does not fluoresce under ultraviolet light. It has a Mohs hardness of 5, is brittle, has an irregular to subconchoidal fracture, and shows no cleavage or parting. The calculated density is 3.027 g/cm 3 . It is uniaxial (-), ω = 1.617, ɛ = 1.613, both ± 0.002. Wopmayite is hexagonal-rhombohedral, space group R 3 c , a 10.3926(2), c 37.1694(9) A, V 3476.7(2) A 3 , Z = 6, a:c = 1:3.577. The seven strongest lines in the X-ray powder-diffraction pattern are as follows: d (A), I , ( h k l ): 2.858, 100, (02.10); 3.186, 88, (234); 2.589, 68, (240); 5.166, 33, (120); 6.421, 32, (114); 8.017, 31, (012); and 3.425, 29, (1110). Chemical analysis by electron microprobe gave P 2 O 5 46.40, Al 2 O 3 0.38, Fe 2 O 3 0.80, FeO 0.96, MnO 3.74, MgO 0.41, CaO 37.65, SrO 0.91, Na 2 O 5.43, and H 2 O(calc) 2.00, sum 98.68 wt.%. The H 2 O content was determined by crystal-structure analysis. On the basis of 28 O apfu , the empirical formula is (Ca 7 .19 Na 1.88 Sr 0.09 ) Σ9.16 (Mn 0.56 Mg 0.11 Fe 2+ 0.14 Fe 3+ 0.11 Al 0.08 ) Σ1.00 (PO 4 ) 4.63 (PO 3 OH) 2.37 , and the endmember formula is Ca 6 Na 3 □Mn(PO 4 ) 3 (PO 3 OH) 4 . The crystal structure of wopmayite was solved by direct methods and refined to an R 1 index of 2.21% based on 2288 unique observed reflections collected on a three-circle rotating-anode ( M o K α X-radiation) diffractometer equipped with multilayer optics and an APEX-II detector. Wopmayite has a structural unit consisting of an [M 2+ (PO 4 ) 6 ] arrangement that is topologically the same as the structural units in the whitlockite and merrillite structures. The [M 2+ (PO 4 ) 6 ] clusters are linked by Ca polyhedra and (PO 3 Φ) groups of the form {Ca 9 X (PO 3 Φ)} where Φ = O,OH and X = (□, Na, Ca), depending on the mineral species. Wopmayite is related to whitlockite by the substitution Na + H → Ca + □, whereby Na is incorporated primarily at the Ca (3) site and H attaches to the P (1) tetrahedron to produce an acid-phosphate group. Thus merrillite contains no acid-phosphate group, whitlockite contains a single acid-phosphate group at P (3), and wopmayite contains acid-phosphate groups at both P (1) and P (3).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it