MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326151254 · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1368046

Olodaterol 1x täglich via Respimat® über 48 Wochen im Vergleich zu Placebo und Formoterol BID bei Patienten mit COPD: gepoolte Sicherheitsanalyse

2014· article· de· W2326151254 on OpenAlexaff
Armin Koch, Lorcan McGarvey, Paul Sachs, AL Hamilton, Kay Tetzlaff, Lawrence Korducki, GT Ferguson

Bibliographic record

VenuePneumologie · 2014
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsBoehringer Ingelheim (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFormoterolMedicineCOPDPlaceboGynecologyAnesthesiaInternal medicineInhalation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Einleitung: Der neue langwirksame ß2-Agonist Olodaterol zeigte in klinischen Studien mit einer Dauer von ≤4 Wochen ein überzeugendes Sicherheitsprofil. Ziel der Untersuchung war die Beurteilung der langfristigen Sicherheit von Olodaterol 1x täglich bei Patienten mit COPD (GOLD-Stadium 2 – 4).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePneumologieSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207