MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326196045 · doi:10.1093/jts/flt043

Getting "Saved": The Whole Story of Salvation in the New Testament. Edited By CHARLES H. TALBERT and JASON A. WHITLARK.

2013· article· en· W2326196045 on OpenAlexaff
J. K. Hardin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Theological Studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsWycliffe College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyTheologyPietyNew TestamentObligationLegalism (Western philosophy)Religious studiesLawPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This volume of 12 essays—seven of which have previously been published—is devoted to the soteriology of the New Testament from a post-Sanders perspective. That is to say, the authors seek to answer two related questions: (1) how is post-conversion faithfulness understood by various New Testament writers and (2) do these writers move beyond covenantal nomism to a ‘new covenant piety’ (p. 3). The reader will discover a more or less homogeneous answer to the former question and an affirmative answer to the latter. The first four essays belong to a section on the Pauline corpus. Talbert begins with a republished essay on the so-called New Perspective on Paul. He contends that ‘works of the Law’ cannot be reduced to boundary markers, that even covenantal nomism is legalistic when seen in its eschatological framework, and that Paul’s anthropology was thoroughly pessimistic. Furthermore, Paul opposed legalism and synergism—he argues both were well represented in Paul’s day—and that divine indwelling (e.g. ‘being clothed’, Gal. 3:27) enabled the believer to live a faithful life of discipleship. In the second essay, also republished, Whitlark argues that χάρις in Ephesians does not include the idea of reciprocity so common in the ancient Mediterranean world, where a gift assumed an obligation to ‘repay’ the gift with loyalty. Instead, the author of Ephesians, like Philo, believed that ongoing obedience to God could be found solely in God’s conferral of χάρις: ‘Piety in Ephesians seems to be reliance upon God for continual supplies of χάρις and not repayment for χάρις already received’ (p. 56). Talbert then turns to the soteriology of the Pastoral Epistles. He argues that the use of exempla—virtues in others that are worthy of imitation—serve as a ‘catalyst for good performance’ (p. 67) and enables post-conversion faithfulness. Whitlark concludes the Pauline section with an essay from his monograph on Hebrews (to be sure, he does not suggest Paul was its author). On his reading, the author of Hebrews urged the auditors to persevere in their faith by attaching themselves to Jesus’ high priestly ministry of the new covenant (e.g. Jeremiah 31).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Theological StudiesSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207