MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326314382 · doi:10.1107/s0108767308080355

<i>LaueGUI</i>– an open source Matlab tool for online inspection of time-resolved Laue diffraction patterns

2008· article· en· W2326314382 on OpenAlexaff
M. Messerschmidt, T. Tschentscher

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsOpen sourceMATLABDiffractionComputer scienceOpticsComputer graphics (images)PhysicsSoftwareOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pink beam Laue diffraction is a powerful tool for determining timeresolved crystallographic structure.The large bandwidth compared to a monochromatic beam allows the simultaneous collection of hundreds of reflections even for moderate size unit cells at fixed orientation.Below 100 X-ray pulses are needed due to the high brightness of the pink beam at a synchrotron.This allows fast data collection and limits sample degradation due to laser excitation.However, there is a large gap between the speed of data collection and the speed of analysis tools.The purpose of LaueGUI is to fill this void by rapidly evaluating time-resolved Laue patterns.The program is based on the use of Precognition (Renz Research), but special care has been taken that the software is self contained in the Matlab environment.LaueGUI is open source written in an object oriented style.It's controlled through a graphical user interface (GUI) and loads free format ASCII files for many configurations.The code was executed with MAR165 and MAR133 (MAR Research) images but other detector image formats can be supported.Successful analysis was completed in a few seconds per image with data from ESRF[1], KEK-AR[2] and APS(BioCARS) [3].At ESRF data from TTF-CA single crystals were collected using 50 single pulses of the 16 bunch mode at ID09b (U17, 9mm gap, 18keV, 3% bandwidth) that allowed full structure refinement.Comparable data were collected for organometallic samples at KEK-AR using 3-10 single bunches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1960.088

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of CrystallographySame topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207