Proinsulin C-peptide potentiates the inhibitory action of insulin on glucose synthesis in primary cultured rabbit kidney-cortex tubules: Metabolic studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Effects of equimolar concentrations of proinsulin C-peptide and insulin on glucose synthesis were studied in primary cultures of rabbit kidney-cortex tubules grown in the presence of alanine, glycerol, and octanoate. The rhodamine-labeled C-peptide entered renal tubular cells and localized in nuclei, both in the presence and absence of insulin; preincubations with the unlabeled compound inhibited internalization. C-peptide did not affect glucose formation when added alone but potentiated the inhibitory action of insulin by about 20% due to a decrease in flux through glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI) and (or) glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase). GPI inhibition was caused by: (i) increased intracellular contents of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate and fructose-1-phosphate, inhibitors of the enzyme and (ii) reduced level of the phosphorylated GPI, which exhibits higher enzymatic activity in the presence of casein kinase 2. A decrease in flux through G6Pase, due to diminished import of G6P by G6P-transporter from the cytoplasm into endoplasmic reticulum lumen, is also suggested. The data show for the first time that in the presence of insulin and C-peptide, both GPI and G6P-ase may act as regulatory enzymes of renal gluconeogenic pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".